Legal Opinion

Crickon v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2009No. 08-35250PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jerry Crickon (Crickon) challenges regulations promulgated by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) that categorically exclude prisoners with certain prior convictions from early release eligibility. Because we conclude that the BOP failed to provide a rational explanation for the exclusion in the administrative record, we reverse the district court’s decision denying Crickon’s habeas petition.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Regulatory Background

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3621 governs the terms of imprisonment for a person convicted of a federal crime. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621. In 1990, Congress…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Sacora v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Altera Corp. v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API