Crickon v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jerry Crickon (Crickon) challenges regulations promulgated by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) that categorically exclude prisoners with certain prior convictions from early release eligibility. Because we conclude that the BOP failed to provide a rational explanation for the exclusion in the administrative record, we reverse the district court’s decision denying Crickon’s habeas petition.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Regulatory Background
Title 18 U.S.C. § 3621 governs the terms of imprisonment for a person convicted of a federal crime. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621. In 1990, Congress…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sacora v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Altera Corp. v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.