Legal Opinion

Clark v. Spokesman-Review

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2007No. 32565PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This ease asks us to decide whether there are genuine issues of material fact on Appellant Trent L. Clark’s defamation claim, thereby rendering summary judgment improper. This case also asks the Court to decide whether Clark’s false light invasion of privacy tort claim should survive summary judgment. We affirm the grant of summary judgment on both claims.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Thomas Clouse co-wrote an article published by the Spokesman Review about a potential Republican senatorial candidate, Bob Nonini, which discussed Nonini’s drug arrest, Nonini’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Siercke v. SierckeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Candace Elliott v. Steve MurdockIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Berian v. BerberianIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Irish v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API