State v. Dixon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
The defendant pleaded guilty to a violation of ORS 163.210 (rape) and appeals from a judgment of imprisonment for “an indeterminate term not to exceed his natural life.”
After a plea of guilty, only the excessiveness or illegality of the sentence may be considered upon an appeal. ORS 138.050; State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-542, 368 P2d 323 (1962). A sentence may be excessive because it is beyond the maximum statutory penalty, or because it is “cruel or unusual.” State v. Montgomery, 237 Or 593, 392 P2d 642 (1964). A sentence may also be attacked at any time if the statute under which it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. JairlOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Jensen v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Civil Commitment of JHMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.