Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The defendant pleaded guilty to a violation of ORS 163.210 (rape) and appeals from a judgment of imprisonment for “an indeterminate term not to exceed his natural life.”

After a plea of guilty, only the excessiveness or illegality of the sentence may be considered upon an appeal. ORS 138.050; State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-542, 368 P2d 323 (1962). A sentence may be excessive because it is beyond the maximum statutory penalty, or because it is “cruel or unusual.” State v. Montgomery, 237 Or 593, 392 P2d 642 (1964). A sentence may also be attacked at any time if the statute under which it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. JairlOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jensen v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Civil Commitment of JHMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API