Legal Opinion
Unibrand Tire & Product Co. v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 4, 1977No. Civ. 74-500PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff (“Unibrand”) on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated 1 commenced the present action against defendant (“Armstrong”) as the result of the refusal by Armstrong to deal with Unibrand in the sale of off-the-road, industrial and farm tires. The Complaint was filed under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) to recover treble damages which Unibrand claims to have sustained by reason of alleged violations by Armstrong of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2).
Armstrong has moved against the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fiorino v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Gilbuilt Homes, Inc. A/K/A Gilbilt Homes, Inc. v. Continental Homes of New England, a Division of Wylain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Knickerbocker Toy Co., Inc. v. Winterbrook Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1982
- Eye Encounter, Inc. v. Contour Art, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Walker v. THI of New Mexico at Hobbs CenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.