Legal Opinion

Schmoldt v. Bolen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1938No. 28536PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Issuance of state treasury notes, as permitted by article 3, chapter 27, Okla. Sess. Laws 1937, is- here sought to be enjoined by this original proceeding brought by a taxpayer against the State Treasurer, the State Auditor, and the Governor, to whom the act has committed the responsibility of determining the amount of and approving the notes to he issued. The validity of the authorizing provisions of the act was questioned in the case of Davis v. Childers, 181 Okla. 468, 74 P.2d 930, but because the trial court did not pass upon the constitutional features presented, we did not consider them…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Rankin v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Graham v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Draper v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. In Re State Treasury Note IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Carter v. MileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API