Legal Opinion

State v. City of Aberdeen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1904No. 4861PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin,. J., entered September 26, 1903, sustaining a demurrer to one of plaintiff’s causes of action, and from that part of the judgment thereupon entered dismissing said cause.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The state of Washington instituted this action against the city of Aberdeen, a municipal corporation, to recover a balance alleged to be due the state from said municipality, on account of moneys received by it for the issuance of licenses to sell intoxicating liquors. The demand is made under and by virtue of the statute of 1888, as found in § 2934, Bal. Code, which provides that ten per cent of the annual liquor license fees, paid to the treasurer of an incorporated city or town, shall be paid into the general fund of the state treasury.

The complaint contains two causes of action. The first…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. New Orleans v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Townsend v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Committee on Water PollutionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Hodde v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API