Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Drubin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 29, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierson B. Hildreth, S.

In this probate proceeding the question presented is whether all necessary parties have been cited and made parties to the proceeding. Proponent, who is decedent’s wife and an executor named in the will, seeks to have the will admitted to probate without citing or otherwise obtaining jurisdiction over two other persons designated and appointed by the testator in his will to act as guardian of his infant daughter and also to act as executrix in the event the wife “ shall predecease me or shall fail to qualify, die, resign, or cease to act for any reason as Executrix.”

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of Last Will & Testament of HealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. In Re the Will of BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. In re the Estate of BrowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of MeiselmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API