Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Browning

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 6, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.,

Acting Surrogate. The sole question presented upon this motion is the right of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company to file objections to the probate of the second codicil of the deceased. A will and first codicil have already been probated and in both instruments the Title Guarantee and Trust Company is named as sole executor. The Appellate Division has determined that the procedure' heretofore had has been improper and has stated that there should be a trial after the filing of objections and then proceeding in the ordinary way to trial either with or without a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament & Codicils Thereto of BrowningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LernerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  2. In re the Estate of PeckolickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
  3. Dillow v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. In re the Estate of MarksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of DrubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API