Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Meiselman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 3, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' Wingate, S.

This is a motion seeking a direction to the clerk of this court to receive the moving parties petition for probate of the will and codicil of this decedent and to issue a citation thereon and to stay all proceedings in connection with a previously filed petition for probate of the same instruments and cancel the citation issued thereon.

The alleged will and codicil which both parties seek to probate are dated respectively January 6, 1928, and August 29, 1928. The “ Nineteenth item of the alleged will names Jacob Robbins, Morris Bienenstoek and Isidor Weis as executors and trustees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of LasakNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Bloodgood v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  5. Foster v. FosterNew York Court of Chancery · 1838

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SeppalaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of TracyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of De CosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of SandersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API