Legal Opinion

State v. Corbett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 167A81PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

We will discuss each defendant’s assignments of error separately.

Defendant Rhone

This defendant first contends that the indictment charging him with first degree rape was fatally defective for failure to allege the averment “with force and arms” which, he maintains, is required under G.S. § 15-144.1 (Cum. Supp. 1981). He further contends that “since the indictment was fatally defective, the charge to the jury and the entry of verdicts and judgment against [him] which were based on the indictment are equally defective and must be reversed.” We do not agree.

In support of his…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API