Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1926No. 27669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

The defendant was charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced for the larceny of an automobile. From the verdict and sentence he appealed.

He relies upon two bills of exception.

Bill No. 1 recites that the district attorney in his closing argument to the jury said:

“The attorney for the defense has given np his case by stating to the jury that, even if they find the accused is the party who took the car, in that event a conviction would not be warranted, for the reason that the evidence in the case showed that said automobile was obtained for the purpose of a joy ride.”

Defendant’s counsel excepted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. State v. SpurlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. State v. MecheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. State v. MaxeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HeintzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. State v. WilburnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. State v. WilburnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API