Legal Opinion

State v. Heintz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1932No. 31573PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

The defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to serve not less than nine nor more than fourteen years at hard labor in the state penitentiary, and appealed.

The only bill of exception argued before this court is the one reserved to the ruling of the trial court refusing to grant defendant a new trial.

The basis of the motion is that since the trial and conviction defendant has discovered new evidence which it is alleged was not discovered before the trial, and which, if admitted on a second trial, would change the results.

The only new evidence discovered by defendant is that which, it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. State v. MaxeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. State v. PastorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. State v. FoldenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. State v. FreetimeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. State v. GourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. State v. WilburnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API