Legal Opinion

Bell v. Newkirk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1932No. 30,689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to reform a certificate of fra-, ternal insurance and to recover the amount specified therein.

*112It appears that on July 20, 1919, a fraternal insurance society named the Court of Honor issued a certificate of insurance for $1,000 to one Finis Bell) of Kansas City, in which' his wife, Clemma Bell, was named as beneficiary.

Bell and wife were working-class folk; he was a railway and packing-house employee; she was a waitress and kept a rooming house. Until the last couple of months of Bell’s life his wife paid the monthly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maddy v. HockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Shouse v. Consolidated Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Linscott v. HughbanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Tovey v. GeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Lawson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API