Legal Opinion
Koru North America v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 23, 1988No. Court 88-04-00293PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, Koru North America, brings this action to contest the United States Customs Service’s (Customs) exclusion of frozen Hoki fillets that entered through the port of Seattle under entry #110-0659025-8 on February 23, 1988. Upon determining that plaintiff improperly marked the subject merchandise as a “Product of New Zealand,” rather than as a “Product of the Soviet Union,” for country of origin purposes, Customs issued a Notice of Redelivery with respect to these goods. Plaintiff claims that since the product was correctly marked, Customs improperly issued the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CPC International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Boltex Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Uniden America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- CPC International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.