State Treasurer v. Wilson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*140Williams, C.J.
The equal protection question presented in this case depends ultimately upon whether the Legislature intended 1935 PA 253, the Prison Reimbursement Act, to apply only to inmates of the three penal institutions named in the act, or to all inmates of the state prison system.
Defendants contend that the reference by name to the three penal institutions existing at the time of enactment of 1935 PA 253 means that the Legislature intended the act to apply only to those three prisons and not to any institutions later added to the corrections system. We hold that, while 1935 PA 253…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Storey v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.