Legal Opinion

Boyertown Mutual Insurance v. Skias

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided April 4, 1996No. 1270-95 A.DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ESHELMAN, J.,

Petitioner, Celina Mutual Insurance Company, has appealed from our order entered February 2,1996 which denied their petition to intervene. This opinion is in support of our order pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. §1925.

Celina Mutual Insurance Company, petitioner, herein, has filed a petition to intervene in the above declaratory judgment action commenced by Boyertown Mutual Insurance Company, respondent herein. Petitioner and respondent have entered into a stipulation of fact. That stipulation may be summarized in the following paragraph:

Franklin Caceres and his wife, Angelita Ortega…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Carlsson v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Davish v. GidleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Schramm v. Allegheny County Sanitation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API