Legal Opinion
Papagiannis v. Pontikis
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 15, 1985No. 85 C 09474PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Thomas and Angie Papagiannis (“Papagiannises”) and Nicholas Saltouros (“Saltouros”) have sued John Pontikis (“Pontikis”) and Gus Hormovitis (“Hormovitis”), individually and doing business as J & J Petroleum Co. (“J & J”), Milton Marks (“Marks”), individually and as agent of Continental Energy Corporation (“Continental”), and Continental itself, each plaintiff claiming to have been bilked by defendants in oil well investments. Because the Complaint represents an impermissible joinder of separate claims, this Court sua sponte directs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Northern Trust Bank/O'hare, N.A. v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- R.A.G.S. Couture, Inc. v. Mary M. Hyatt and Oren M. WelborneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Saval v. BL Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Soper v. Simmons International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Torwest DBC, Inc. v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.