Legal Opinion
Coughlin v. Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1997No. 96-56479PublishedCited by 352 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Morris Coughlin and forty-eight other individuals (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order granting defendants Richard Rogers’ (Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the Los Angeles District Office) and the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s motion to sever plaintiffs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
On February 12, 1996, plaintiffs filed a Complaint for a Writ in the Nature of Mandamus (“complaint”) in federal district court, requesting the court to compel the defendants to adjudicate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brunet v. United Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. AntalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Grayson v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Robert Anderson v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by352 opinions
- Hagan v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Carla Visendi v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
347 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.