Legal Opinion

Dym v. Merit Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 24, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The plaintiff fell into a grease pit on premises maintained by the defendant as a gas station and brought this action for personal injuries. It was tried to the jury, the verdict was for the plaintiff, the defendant moved to set it aside, the motion was denied and the defendant appeals therefrom and from the judgment, assigning error in the. charge and in the finding.

The jury might have found the following facts: The defendant operates a large gasoline service station at the corner of two city streets, both heavily traveled, where gas and oil are sold, cars are greased and tires are inflated.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Kelley v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Bunnell v. Waterbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Guilford v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker Ex Rel. Parker v. Stevenson Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Houston v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Dickau v. RafalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Sinclair Refining Company v. ReddingWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Klein v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API