Legal Opinion
Fenstermaker v. Elwood
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 1984No. 5-83-34PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
Defendant, Randy J. Elwood, appeals from a judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas and raises four assignments of error as follows:
“I. The trial court erred in granting a judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff, where plaintiff elected recision [sic] as his sole and only remedy.
“II. The trial court erred in granting plaintiff a money judgment for damages upon his complaint under the theory of promissory estoppel, for the reason that neither equitable estoppel nor promissory estoppel can constitute the basis for recovery by a plaintiff who alleges damages by virtue of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Friedland v. LipmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Klott v. Associates Real EstateOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Molnar v. BeriswellOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gre-Ter Enters., Inc. v. Mgmt. Recruiters Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
- Scioto Land Co. v. KnauffOhio Court of Appeals · 2023