Legal Opinion
State Bank v. Belk
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1898No. 8384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. See opinion for references to cases.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
The State Bank of Ceresco, Nebraska, brought this suit in the district court of Lancaster county against William Belk on a promissory note. Belk had judgment, to review which the bank has filed here a petition in error.
The note declared upon by the bank was in words and figures as follows:
“1300.00. Oeresco, Neb., Sept. 30,1889.
“On demand after date, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of the State Bank of Oeresco, Nebraska, three hundred dollars, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per anum from maturity until paid. This note is given as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Hamilton v. ThrallNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Sylvester v. Carpenter Paper Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. SternsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- First National Bank v. BurneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Agnew v. MontgomeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Nebraska Land & Feeding Co. v. TrauermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Drake v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.