Gomez v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
We granted review to decide whether a court commissioner has the authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of mandamus or habeas corpus under Code of Civil Procedure section 259, subdivision (a), which authorizes commissioners to “[h]ear and determine ex parte motions for orders and alternative writs and writs of habeas corpus.” We conclude that section 259, subdivision (a) does grant this authority to commissioners and that, at least when the petition seeks to enforce a prisoner’s rights while in confinement—but does not seek to collaterally attack the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Gonzales v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
- United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- PaintCare v. MortensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.