McCoy v. Holman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). Appellant contends that a local improvement must consist of a single unit and that the county court was without power to organize a district" for the construction of three separate and distinct improvements. The statute under which the district was organized provides: “Upon the petition of a majority in value of the owners of real property in any territory adjacent to a city having a population of more than ten thousand inhabitants, as shown by the last Federal census, it shall be the duty of the county court to lay off into an improvement district the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Commerce v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Bateman v. Board of Commissioners of Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Wilson v. BlanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Searcy Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of SearcySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005