Legal Opinion
Pulaski-Lonoke Drainage Dist. v. Missouri Pac. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1930No. 8713PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
The Pulaski-Lonoke drainage district was organized prior to November, 1921. In a proceeding for the ascertainment of damages and benefits incidental to the establishment of a drainage ditch or ditches in accordance with the purposes of said drainage district, and with plans and specifications provided therefor, the assessment of benefits placed against the property of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company was $14,947.68. The railroad company removed the case to the United States Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and on November 21, 1921, that court,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kearney v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Rogers v. Union Central Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Wells v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Close v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Beck v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Pulaski—Lonoke Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931