Legal Opinion

Beck v. Federal Land Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1945No. 12878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Our previous opinion, 146 F.2d 623, directed that the record be remitted to the district court, for supplementing or amendment of the order of dismissal, to indicate if evidence had been taken on whether appellant was a farmer. We retained jurisdiction to dispose of the appeal, after the record was returned, on the submission theretofore made.

The record has now been returned to us, with a supplement containing an amended •order of dismissal, showing that appellant’s petition was dismissed after a hearing and consideration of some testimony given by appellant before the conciliation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pratt v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. Beck v. Federal Land Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Pulaski-Lonoke Drainage Dist. v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Spruill v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Antoine Lamont Eubanks v. United States of America; Trenton BehnkeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API