State v. Artis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. First, he contends the trial court erred by refusing to allow him to assert his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination in response to questions asked during cross-examination. In a related assignment of error, he contends the trial court erred by allowing the district attorney to comment during closing argument on defendant’s attempt to assert this privilege. Next, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s comment on certain portions of the evidence in the presence of the jury. Defendant’s final assignments of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Williams v. CurrieDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000