Legal Opinion

Potts v. Marley Engineered Products

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 14, 2025No. 4:23-cv-04875Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Daniel Thadd Potts, Jr., C/A No. 4:23-cv-4875-SAL Plaintiff, v. ORDER Marley Engineered Products and SPX Technologies, Defendants. Plaintiff Daniel Thadd Potts, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendants Marley Engineered Products and SPX Technologies (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”). Defendants move to dismiss. [ECF No. 53.] This matter is before the court on the Report and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API