Legal Opinion

R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 26, 2000No. AC 19234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiffs, R & R Pool & Patio, Inc.,1 Mitchell Ross, David Ross and Philip Ross,2 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Ridgefield sustaining the Ridgefield zoning enforcement officer’s issuance of a cease and desist order against certain retail sales on the plaintiffs’ property. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) failed to conclude that they were denied due process of law by the zoning enforcement officer and the defendant, (2)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Francini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Beit Havurah v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Carnemolla v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Daw v. Zoning Board of Appeals of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Rr Pool Patio v. Ridgefield, No. Cv990336560 (Aug. 9, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API