Legal Opinion

People's Savings Bank v. Hine

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1902No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by the People’s Savings Bank of West Bay City against Frederica Hine upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note in the sum of $200, made by the defendant in the name of Hine & Co., payable to the order of the Valley Coal Company, indorsed on the back, “Valley Coal Company, I. J. Hiller, Secretary.” The plaintiff recovered *182judgment by direction of the court, and defendant brings error.'

Objection was made to the introduction of the note in evidence, upon the ground that the authority of Hiller to make the indorsement had not been proved. The record shows that the note in question was given in part renewal of other paper made by the defendant and indorsed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. State Savings Bank v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. National Turners Building & Loan Ass'n v. SchreitmuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Zeigler v. Valley Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Title Bond & Mortgage Co. v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Valley Jitney Jungle Co. v. HamadyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API