Legal Opinion

People v. Haynes

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1998No. A075845PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

— Defining the scope of aiding and abetting liability for robbery is a task which has occupied our appellate courts often in recent years. In this unusual case, we consider the added complexity arising when the direct perpetrator attacks the same victim twice in close succession, for the same property. Was there one robbery or two? When did each begin and end? When does this matter? These and other questions are posed in claims of instructional error and insufficient evidence raised by Sidney Alfonzo Haynes (defendant) following his jury-trial conviction and sentence for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. DieguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API