Legal Opinion
Jurin v. Google Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2011No. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-KJMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Through this action, Plaintiff Daniel Jurin (“Plaintiff’) alleges several violations of state and federal law arising out of the use of its trademarked name “Styrotrim” by Defendant Google, Inc. (“Defendant”). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second and Sixth Causes of Action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 1 . As set forth below, Defendant’s Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND 2
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- San Diego Cnty. Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Haywood v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026