Rodney Gordon v. West Houston Trees. Ltd
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
DISSENTING OPINION
LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.
Because it appears to me that the majority opinion incorrectly identifies Gordon’s claim against West Houston Trees and misapplies the law related to suits to quiet title, I respectfully dissent in part and concur in the judgment only in part.
Gordon’s Claim
The majority identifies Gordon’s claim against West Houston Trees as a wrongful foreclosure claim. This is incorrect.
While he stated in the introductory paragraph of his petition that “his property was wrongfully foreclosed on pursuant to an invalid lien,” Gordon never otherwise identifies what…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Martin v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Hahn v. Love, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.