Nixon v. School District No. 92
Supreme Court of Kansas
Pkror from McPherson District Court. The plaintiff Nixon alleges error in an order made by the district judge, at chambers, February 27, 1884, dissolving a temporary restraining order. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The plaintiff, Harrison B. Nixon, commenced an action in the district court of McPherson county, Kansas, against the defendants, School District No. 92, of McPherson county, and the officers of such district, to restrain them from erecting, Or attempting to erect, a school house upon a certain site designated and described in the plaintiff’s petition. A temporary restraining order was granted by the probate judge of the county. Subsequently the defendants filed a motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order, which motion afterward…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Craft v. Com'rs Jackson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Slezak v. OusdigianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Weigand v. LesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Thompson v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Haines v. Rural High School District No. 3Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.