Haines v. Rural High School District No. 3

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiffs designate this action as one to enjoin the illegal expenditure of funds voted for one purpose and being used for another, while defendants designate it as one to question their authority to expend funds lawfully levied and collected for purposes authorized by a majority of the electors of each district. The action represents the second chapter of litigation commenced and disposed of in State, ex rel., v. Rural High School Dist. No. 3, 169 Kan. 671, 220 P. 2d 164. We note that the third chapter is disposed of in Kroeger v. Rural…