Legal Opinion

Gorke v. Le Clerc

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 31, 1962No. File 127371PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

The substance of the plaintiff’s complaint is that plaintiff is the administrator of the estate of Baby Boy Gorke, that the baby was en ventre sa mere and due to be born in about two weeks when, as the result of the defendant’s negligent operation of her automobile, he was killed and caused to be born dead. To this complaint the defendant has demurred on the ground that there is no right of action to a stillborn child or to the representative of such stillborn child’s estate for injury or death which occurred to the child before birth.

The demurrer admits for the purpose of the present…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mitchell v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Chrisafogeorgis v. BrandenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kwaterski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API