Legal Opinion

Egan v. North American Loan Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom Multnomah: Alfred P. Sears, Jr., Judge. This is a motion to set aside a decree. The facts are that on August 24,1891, B. F. Egan, plaintiff’s husband, being the owner of lots 6 and 7 in block 24 in North Portland, formerly Albina, secured from the defendant the North American Savings, Loan & Building Company, a corporation existing under the laws of Minnesota, a loan of $1,200, and gave to it his promissory note as evidence thereof, with monthly interest at the rate of…

Read the full summary

Prom Multnomah: Alfred P. Sears, Jr., Judge. This is a motion to set aside a decree. The facts are that on August 24,1891, B. F. Egan, plaintiff’s husband, being the owner of lots 6 and 7 in block 24 in North Portland, formerly Albina, secured from the defendant the North American Savings, Loan & Building Company, a corporation existing under the laws of Minnesota, a loan of $1,200, and gave to it his promissory note as evidence thereof, with monthly interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum, payable after three and before nine years, upon the maturity of thirty-six shares of its capital…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

1. It is contended by defendants’ counsel that plaintiff, having alleged that Graves was appointed receiver of the defendant corporation, neglected to aver that she had secured leave of court to institute proceedings against him, and, this being so, the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit, and an error was committed in overruling the motion. Our statute, in defining the office of a receiver and prescribing the duties devolving upon him,* is as follows : “A receiver is a person appointed by a court or judicial officer to take charge of property during the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Gilman v. KetchamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mayer v. MayerOregon Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sterrett v. Stoddard Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Finch v. Pacific Reduction & Chemical Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In re Marks' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Johnston v. Braymill White Pine Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Goyne v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API