Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Jordan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1930No. Docket No. 205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Appellant brought this action to quiet his title to land in Kern County. Respondent appeared by answer and cross-complaint and denied appellant’s title, and asserted title in himself. Judgment was rendered quieting title to the property in respondent.

About September 7, 1887, appellant filed Ms application with the United States Land Office at Visalia, California, to homestead the land involved, under the laws of the United States. The land was then part of the public domain belonging to the federal government. Appellant commenced to reside on the property in March, 1888, and continued to so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Nevada National Bank v. Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Cent.l Pac. R.R. Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Norton v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Woody v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Florer v. Wood River Valley Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API