Legal Opinion

Ruddy v. Ruddy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 1985No. 84-1116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dissolution of marriage case, the wife makes two contentions on appeal. First, the wife contends that the trial court erred in denying her request for lump sum alimony or special equity. Second, the wife contends that the trial court erred in awarding to the husband the wife’s interest in two pieces of jointly held property.

*591As to the first contention, we affirm. See Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983).

As to the second contention, we agree with the wife and reverse. The trial court was without authority to make the award to the husband of the wife’s interest in jointly held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conner v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Hu v. HuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barlow v. BarlowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Havener v. HavenerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API