Legal Opinion

Havener v. Havener

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 1985No. 84-1792Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

2Per curiam

Appellant wife’s motion for rehearing en banc fails to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(c)(2). However, we treat her motion as a motion for rehearing.

In this motion the wife alleges that in affirming the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of marriage we overlooked one of her arguments. She contends that appellee husband’s pleadings were insufficient to allow the court to award him her interest in their jointly owned sailboat, the former marital premises. ' Appellant is correct. Ruddy v. Ruddy, 464 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d *709DCA…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hu v. HuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Ruddy v. RuddyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API