Legal Opinion

Conner v. Conner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 13, 1983No. 62089PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

439 So.2d 887 (1983)

Doyle Edward CONNER, Petitioner,

v.

Johnnie B. CONNER and L. Ralph Smith, Respondents.

No. 62089.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 13, 1983.

Gene D. Brown of Brown & Camper, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Sidney L. Matthew of Gorman & Matthew, Tallahassee, Simon, Schindler & Tripp, Miami, and L. Ralph Smith, Jr. of Dearing & Smith, Tallahassee, for respondents.

2Per curiam

This cause, Conner v. Conner, 411 So.2d 899 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), is before us pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution as conflicting with Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1976). We have…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Conner v. ConnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. International Funding Corp. v. Decora Steel City, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

4Cited by74 opinions

  1. Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Marcoux v. MarcouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Gardner v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Carroll v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API