Legal Opinion

Haehnlein v. Henry

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1987No. 13026PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaird, J.

This cause came on before the court upon appellant’s appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

Appellee, Cecil J. Henry, was the driver of a vehicle which collided with Gerald G. Haehnlein’s truck. Haehn-lein filed suit against Henry. Because Henry conceded that he was liable and that he caused some injury to Haehn-lein, the matter proceeded to trial only as to the amount of damages.

The jury received a general verdict form for the plaintiff on Gerald Haehnlein’s claim. It received a verdict form for the plaintiff and one for the defendant on Mrs. Haehnlein’s claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. ChardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company and Grundy Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Myron F. Skillin v. Earle W. Kimball, Etc., Therm'x CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Staff Builders, Inc. v. ArmstrongOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Thomas D. Cundiff v. Virginia Lee WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Avondet v. BlanksteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Greynolds v. KurmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Cooper v. Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API