Legal Opinion

Greynolds v. Kurman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1993No. 16038PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward J. Mahoney, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Andrew Kurman, M.D., appeals from a jury verdict rendered against him in favor of plaintiff-appellee, K. Jack Greynolds, in a medical malpractice action. The malpractice action arose after Dr. Kurman performed a cerebral angiogram on Greynolds which caused Greynolds to suffer a stroke. We affirm.

Factual Background

In late July 1987, Greynolds and his wife, Mary Greynolds, visited relatives in Charleston, West Virginia. During the visit, Greynolds suffered from a transient ischemic attack (“TLA”) on July 29. A TLA is “a sudden loss of neurological…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Nickell v. GonzalezOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Aaron Campbell, Administrator of the Estate of Raymond Campbell, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Avondet v. BlanksteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Cooper v. Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McDonnell v. McPartlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Romp v. HaigOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Russo v. GissingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API