Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1994No. 8605-80305; CA A78160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The state appeals from a juvenile court order that granted a “conditional postponement.” It contends that the court had no authority to enter that type of order.1 Child argues that the order is not an appealable order. We address that issue first.

On July 30, 1992, the stated filed a petition under former ORS 419.476(l)(a), alleging that child was within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, because he was under the age of 18 and had committed an act which, if done by an adult, would constitute sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405-(l)(c). During a hearing on November 18,1993, child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel Juv. Dept. v. MTOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API