State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Bishop
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Child was determined to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute first degree rape. ORS 163.375(l)(b); ORS 419.476(l)(a). The issue is whether the court erred in denying child’s motion for alternative disposition.
Before the jurisdictional proceeding, child’s attorney filed a motion to dispose of the case without criminal prosecution, seeking to have the case resolved by some alternative means, such as an informal disposition agreement, ORS 419.635, amendment of the petition so that it would only allege dependency, conditional…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Application of ShrewsburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. C. E. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. EichlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Longhini v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.