Legal Opinion

Freiberg v. Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1936No. 1310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law instituted on June 16, 1933, by A. H. Freiberg, a resident and citizen of Iowa, against R. H. Pierce, a resident and citizen of Oklahoma, to recover $111,320.64. The bill of complaint set up 13 causes of action. Plaintiff’s first 12 causes of action are bottomed on various business transactions between the parties during the years 1923 to 1927 involving notes, checks, drafts, certificates of deposit in a bank, and a lost written guaranty of money invested by plaintiff in a certain gas lease and gas well. Each cause of action contains an allegation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. De Arnaud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Union Pac. R. v. SyasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. United States v. SandsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. Norman v. Waterman S. S. Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API