Rogers v. Cranston
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.
Respondent, a doctor of medicine, moved his family from Ohio to California in 1955. He brought certain funds with him, representing his earnings in Ohio. The parties agree that these earnings were earned during his marriage; *103therefore they were "quasi-community property” as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code, section 15300. These funds were his separate property under the law of Ohio. In California he used them to purchase various parcels of real property and placed title in joint tenancy between himself and his wife who furnished no part of the consideration. She died on July 23, 1964.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flournoy v. SperryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Rogers v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Flournoy v. SabolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Rogers v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966