Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2017No. 17-KA-81PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChehardy, C.J.
hOn appeal, defendant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an Anders brief on defendant’s behalf asserting that there is no basis for a non-frivolous appeal. Further, defendant has filed a pro se supplemental brief alleging one assignment of error. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences.
Facts and Procedural History
Because defendant pled guilty, the facts were not fully developed in the record. However, during the guilty plea colloquy, the State provided the following factual basis for the guilty plea:
On April 22nd, 2013, Lashawn Davis, Charlie Gumms,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GummsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. KruebbeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State of Louisiana Versus Walter Dj ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018