Legal Opinion
State v. Gumms
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 2018No. 17–KA–566PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChehardy, C.J.
On appeal, defendant's appointed appellate counsel has filed an Anders brief on defendant's behalf asserting that there is no basis for a non-frivolous appeal. Further, defendant has filed a pro se supplemental brief alleging three assignments of error. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant's convictions and sentences.
Facts and Procedural History
Because defendant pled guilty, the facts were not fully developed in the record. However, during the guilty plea colloquy, the State provided the following factual basis for the guilty plea:
*728Bryant Gumms engaged in conduct that furthered the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EnglandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. EnglandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019