Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Vision Service Plan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 2020No. A155219Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/22/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE GORDON EPSTEIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, A155219 v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Respondent. HG16812864) Plaintiff Gordon Epstein, an optometrist, entered into a “Network Doctor Agreement” with Vision Service Plan (VSP) to be part of its provider network. After VSP conducted an audit of Epstein’s claims for reimbursement, it concluded he was knowingly purchasing lenses from an unapproved supplier and terminated the provider…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API