Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Taylor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 2004PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.
¶ 1 Appellant, James M. Taylor, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on May 16, 2003. We affirm.
¶ 2 The facts are as follows. 1 On August 13, 2002, Harrisburg Police received a 911 call from the victim, Morris Smith. Smith, an 84-year-old man, had been struck from behind on the right side of the face while in his garage feeding stray cats and birds. As he lay on the ground, Smith felt the perpetrator going through his pockets. Smith saw the perpetrator fleeing and described him to police.
¶ 3 Police interviewed witness Craig Paige at the Harrisburg Police Bureau. Paige stated that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- No. 98-5283Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ArthurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HoltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Ford v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.